Dollar spot control using iron sulfate and urea

Posted · Reactie toevoegen

Researchers discuss findings from the first year of a two-year study on the effects of iron sulfate and urea on dollar spot development.
May 2019 | Kurt Hockemeyer, M.S.; Chase Straw, Ph.D.; Brian Horgan, Ph.D.; Doug Soldat, Ph.D.; and Paul Koch, Ph.D. GCM_LOGO_GREEN

Dollar spot iron sulfate
Impact of iron sulfate vs. non-treated turf at the O.J. Noer Turfgrass Research and Education Facility in Madison, Wis., on July 18, 2018. Photo by Paul Koch

Dollar spot is the most economically important disease of golf course turfgrass, and insufficient cultural control measures have led to a heavy reliance on repeated use of fungicides.

Iron sulfate (FeSO4) has been used for decades in the turfgrass industry for its ability to improve turfgrass color (3). Recent research out of Oregon State showed that FeSO4 can provide excellent control of Microdochium patch when applied at regular two-week intervals (1). In addition, researchers from Virginia Tech demonstrated that FeSO4 can provide significant reductions in dollar spot on a creeping bentgrass putting green when applied at high rates (1 pound/1,000 square feet; 48.8 kilograms/hectare) every two weeks (2). However, in both cases, the FeSO4 injured the putting surfaces to an unacceptable level after repeated applications.

The objectives of this study are to determine the impact of FeSO4 and urea, both alone and applied as a tank mixture, on the development of dollar spot, and to identify the appropriate reapplication interval and water volume that provide effective dollar spot control and optimal turf quality.

Study design
Separate studies were conducted for each objective listed above, and both studies were replicated at the O.J. Noer Turfgrass Research and Education Facility in Madison, Wis., and at Minnesota Valley Country Club in Bloomington, Minn.

All Wisconsin treatments were initiated on May 17, 2018, and all Minnesota treatments were initiated on May 23. Subsequent applications were made at 7-, 14-, 28- or 42-day intervals. A full list of treatments for both studies can be found in Table 1 and Table 2.

Year 1 results
Objective 1
Treatments containing iron sulfate generally reduced dollar spot relative to the non-treated control at both locations (Table 1). Applying iron sulfate at a seven-day interval was much more effective than applications at a 14-day interval (Table 2). Urea, alone or in combination with other products, was not consistently effective at reducing dollar spot at the rates used in this study. Iron sulfate mixed with Emerald (boscalid, BASF) was extremely effective at suppressing dollar spot at the Minnesota location. However, Emerald did not effectively control dollar spot at the Wisconsin site. The poor control provided in Wisconsin may be an indication of fungicide resistance to Emerald, which has been repeatedly used at the research facility over many years.

Objective 2
At both sites, there was a clear dose response within the seven-day reapplication interval where higher rates of iron sulfate resulted in less dollar spot. The greatest dollar spot reduction was provided by iron sulfate applied at 12 fluid ounces/1,000 square feet (38.2 liters/hectare) every seven days, but this resulted in a very dark color that may be undesirable for superintendents. No strong influence of water volume on dollar spot severity was observed.

Summary
Iron sulfate provided significant suppression of dollar spot in the first year of this two-year study at sites in Wisconsin and Minnesota. The seven-day reapplication interval was almost always more effective than the 14-day interval, suggesting that lower rates at shorter intervals is a more effective iron sulfate use strategy than higher rates at longer intervals.

The urea treatments in this study did not consistently reduce dollar spot. The study will be repeated at both locations in year 2, but the fungicide treatment will be changed to account for the possibility of fungicide resistance at the Wisconsin research station.

Literature cited
Mattox, C.M., A. Kowalewski, B. McDonald, J.G. Lambrinos, B. Daviscourt and J. Pscheidt. 2017. Nitrogen and iron sulfate affect Microdochium patch severity and turf quality on annual bluegrass putting greens. Crop Science 57:S:-293-S-300.
McCall, D.S., E. Ervin, C. Shelton, N. Reams and S. Askew. 2016. Influence of ferrous sulfate and its elemental components on dollar spot suppression. Crop Science 57:581-586.
Reams, N.F. 2013. The effect of Fe-sulfate on annual bluegrass, silvery thread moss, and dollar spot populations colonizing creeping bentgrass putting greens. M.S. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Va.
Kurt Hockemeyer is turfgrass diagnostic lab manager in the Department of Plant Pathology at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis. Chase Straw is a post-doctoral research associate, and Brian Horgan is a professor and Extension turfgrass horticulturist in the Department of Horticultural Science at the University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minn. Doug Soldat is a professor in the Department of Soil Science, and Paul Koch is an assistant professor in the Department of Plant Pathology at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis.

Read more: https://www.gcmonline.com/course/environment/news/dollar-spot-iron-sulfate#ixzz5mrkVCpKS